Ding Dong

Fortune Theatre, Dunedin

20/08/2010 - 11/09/2010

Production Details



The Fortune Theatre Presents the NZ Premiere
 
Jacqueline is married to Bernard.
Robert is married to Juliette.
Jacqueline’s having an affair with Robert.
Bernard wants revenge.
Bernard invites Robert and Juliette to dinner.
Without telling Jacqueline.
What will Jacqueline do?
What will Juliette do?
Will Robert still be alive by dessert?
Barbara’s a call girl. Where does she fit in?
And how does the maid Marie-Louise cope with all this?
It’s a right DING DONG!
 
With its characters placed in ridiculous situations, DING DONG is a typical fast-paced, hilarious French Farce. Fawlty Towers, 3rd Rock From The Sun and Frasier tickle your fancy? DING DONG is for you. Just with a little more spice.

We’re turning up the heat for you with DING DONG. It’s just the party for a cold winter night and best seen in your own party! Grab your wife, your husband, your lover, your friends, your workmates. Make up your group and hustle along to DING DONG!

 
Early bird price for August 21, 22, 24, 25: adults all $25. (Members $20). From August 27 group price for 5+: $28.00, with one free ticket for 6 or more!
 
AND THERE’S STILL MORE!
Book for the first four shows before Aug 20th and be in the draw to win a Pamper Package worth over $800.00, with gifts from UBS, Ghost, Rialto, the Mercure Hotel, Alistair Young Kinesiologist, The Yoga Studio, Octagon Amcal Pharmacy and the Careys Bay Hotel, plus seats to The Pitmen Painters in the Spring from us at the Fortune! 

FORTUNE THEATRE
231 Stuart St (cnr Stuart Street & Moray Place)
Dunedin
August 20th – September 11th 2010
SHOW TIMES: Tues 6 pm, Wed – Sat 7.30pm, Sun 4pm
Click here to book.


Featuring:
Clare Adams as Marie-Louise
Sophia Elisabeth as Juliette
John Glass as Robert
Anna Henare as Jacqueline
Elizabeth McGlinn as Barbara
Tim Raby as Bernard

Set Design                       Peter King
Costume Design             Maryanne Wright-Smyth
Lighting Design              Janis C.Y. Cheng
Stage Manager               Rebecca Tapp
Properties                        Louise Jakeway
Operator                         Hamish Edh: Southern Lights
Sound Technician          Rebecca De Prospo,
Rigging                           Southern Lights: Michael Cracroft-Wilson, Garry Keirle, Hamish Edh  
Set & Furniture Construction     Peter King, Matt Best
Graphic Images and Design       James Best
Graphic Design Finishing           Marti Rowe: Speedprint
Production Photographer           Victor Jarque 



Smart little French farce delights

Review by Barbara Frame 23rd Aug 2010

Marie-Louise (played delightfully by Clare Adams) is supposed to be preparing dinner for Bernard (Tim Raby), his wife Jacqueline (Anna Henare) and their guests, but she’s more interested in seducing Bernard. She also wants to work out who the guests are and, since there are only three of them, this shouldn’t be too hard. 

In fact, most of this smart little French farce consists of people trying either to conceal their own identities or to discover who everyone else is. Bernard, having discovered Jacqueline’s  affair with Robert (John Glass), plots revenge. But Jacqueline, Robert, Robert’s wife Juliette (Sophia Elisabeth) and Barbara (Elizabeth McGlinn), a young lady brought along by Robert for a very specific purpose, keep upsetting his plans. The usual farcical devices of sudden appearances, on-stage concealment and hasty exits are much in evidence, and the "ding dong" of the doorbell and the bell that summons Marie-Louise herald further complications. From the first moment everyone is thoroughly confused except, of course, the attentive and perceptive audience. 

Directed by Amanda Rees, the production exudes all things French. Highly theatrical acting features sustained French accents and exaggerated Gallic gestures. The set, designed by Peter King, is everyone’s idea of a fashionable Paris apartment, and perfectly complements Maryanne Wright-Smyth’s stylish costumes. 

Written by Marc Camoletti, best known for his 1960s hit Boeing Boeing, Ding Dong provides constant surprises and reversals. Visually and verbally amusing, it’s pleasantly inconsequential and entertained a full house on Saturday night. 
_______________________________
For more production details, click on the title above. Go to Home page to see other Reviews, recent Comments and Forum postings (under Chat Back), and News. 

Comments

Make a comment

Is unchallenging entertainment the answer?

Review by Terry MacTavish 22nd Aug 2010

French farce, the recipe as before. The programme blurb even sets out the ingredients: 2 husbands – 2 wives – 1 maid – 1 call girl – 1 apartment in Paris. It’s almost a challenge: do it yourself! Which I daresay would be easy enough if you thought it worthwhile, but why bother when the Fortune is whipping up the lascivious, I mean luscious concoction so effortlessly?

Certainly the opening night audience gobbled it all up with unaffected pleasure, and will have suffered no indigestion from so light a dish.

Director Amanda Rees has sensibly seen Ding Dong as a winter warmer, and has her cast playing for laughs without troubling about social commentary on the adultery, jealousy, revenge and betrayal on which the plot depends. I suppose it could be played as topical satire – the current Listener’s cover story examines the theory that monogamy is not natural – but this fast and furious classic farce has no intention but to amuse.

The action never falters, as husbands and wives dash about the stage, displaying quite extraordinary energy in their attempts to deceive one another.

All farce relies on the exploitation of improbable situations, the more ludicrous the better; an intricate plot with surprising twists; robust action and a cracking pace; disguise and misunderstanding; and an outrageous denouement. Ding Dong ticks all the boxes, though something is still lacking … Humanity perhaps.  

Bernard Marcellin has discovered his wife Jacqueline is having an affair with one Robert Regnier. Instead of confronting her with this, he terrifies Robert into facilitating a revenge affair between Bernard and Robert’s wife, Juliette. That will make everything quite fair. Robert cares enough for his wife to baulk at this, and instead hires a call-girl to pretend to be the wife, and allow herself to be seduced by Bernard. This plan is progressing smoothly until Robert’s actual wife arrives, discovers her husband’s infidelity, and punishes him by pretending to be someone else. 

The actors keep up the pace necessary to prevent awkward questions, like how could Robert possibly fail to recognise his wife, even without her earrings, and if he is so anxious to save his marriage, why was he having an affair in the first place? The characters, who would naturally have been speaking to each other in their own tongue, have been endowed with exaggerated French accents in the ’Allo ’Allo style, which definitely enhances both absurdity and enjoyment.

Tim Raby as Bernard and John Glass as Robert are a shade over-energetic at first, all flapping hands and thrusting pelvises, but they settle into a secure rhythm as the events spiral out of control. Despite fairly circumscribed roles they emerge as individuals. 

The women’s roles are still more stereotypical, but they are carried off with confidence; Anna Henare making a sophisticated Jacqueline and Sophia Elisabeth a suitably indignant Juliette. The call girl is dolly-bird rather than vamp, played with curiously endearing naivety by Elizabeth McGlinn, in the tiniest of sparkly minidresses. 

But the meatiest part is that of a character peripheral to the action, the Marcellin’s enormously resentful maid Marie-Louise, who must respond to the constant ‘ding-dong’ of the doorbell. She is acted with supreme panache by splendid local actor Clare Adams, looking decidedly Gallic with rolled hair and commanding bosom. Her barely suppressed fury, contorted movement and pungent delivery are hilarious, and her every entry is greeted with delighted mirth. 

The production is well supported by the Fortune’s own very competent design team. The set by Peter King has a nice French flavour: sophisticated grey with high ceiling and tall central windows to match, leading out onto an attractive balcony. Stage left there is a rather under-used staircase, but the swing door stage right provides wonderfully explosive entries for tempestuous Marie-Louise. (That there is only one chair, a sleek black number, is an indication of the frenetic rushing around of the cast.) 

Maryanne Wright-Smyth has created some intriguing outfits for the ladies, stylish and hard to categorise time-wise, although they are almost upstaged by the strappy shoes with such horrendously high heels that the ladies all teeter precariously.

Author Marc Camoletti (Swiss-French, Italian heritage but following in the footsteps of Moliere and Feydeau) is better known for writing Boeing-Boeing, about a man juggling three air hostess ‘fiancées’ in yes, a Paris apartment. It was a huge hit of the 1960s, running for years and years in Paris and London, though not, interestingly, succeeding in the USA. Americans apparently regarded being caught with your pants down as too serious for farce. (A recent revival on Broadway has been a hit however; interpret that as you will.)

Ding Dong or Sexe et Jalousie is written later and without the excuse of being ‘of its era’, and personally I question whether this is a play that is worth mounting.*

It lacks the inventive genius of the Fortune’s last production, The 39 Steps, and fails to provide the actors with the same rich material and scope to demonstrate their craft. The characters are shallow, the values are appalling and of course sexist in the extreme, without the irony that might be a saving grace. But because this is farce it would seem ridiculous to exhibit offence.  

Nevertheless, the sponsor’s night audience entered into the spirit of the play with real enthusiasm and responded with warm laughter. We are not, after all, expected to take this gleeful nonsense seriously. As the good old Oxford Companion asserts, ‘Farce has small literary merit, but great entertainment value.’ The Fortune certainly provides that with Ding Dong: ‘great entertainment’ to brighten any Dunedin winter’s night.
– – – – – – – – –
*While I find it disappointing that the Fortune, Dunedin’s only fully professional company, is not presenting more challenging theatre, and in particular more indigenous New Zealand theatre, programming is a complex issue here as elsewhere.

In the 35-odd years since the Fortune was established, the pattern has tended to be the same each year: a popular classic, maybe Shakespeare, a neglected classic, a chance on something new and startling, a New Zealand play, one or two established Broadway or West-End hits, and a children’s play or pantomime.

But the Fortune, under the temporary guidance of courageous Karen Elliot, now has its financial situation to consider, with the shock of Creative New Zealand’s reluctance to fund professional theatres in more than three centres. Hence no doubt, the security blanket of productions of ‘safe’ plays that will attract group bookings by various commercial organisations. The theatre dare no longer take risks.

And this production is a winner, initially at least. The Opening Night audience of Ding Dong was sponsored by Mazda – imagine at least 100 Mazdas parked all around the theatre – and its charming head honcho assured me excitedly that the venture had already proved a most successful promotion.
“They loved the play, not to mention the free bubbly, oh, and the local Gourmet ice-cream, so they’ll think we’re great!”
“You mean they’ll all be popping in to say they’ve been reminded to upgrade their Mazda?” I asked.
“It’s happening already!” he beamed. And what could be wrong with that?

Dunedin, the size of Shakespeare’s London, and with nearly a quarter of its inhabitants being University staff or students, is blessed with several glorious theatres. These are obviously an enormous asset to the tourism industry as well as to our own citizens, especially now as we launch the Otago Festival of the Arts. Yet all are crying out for decent promotion and support. 

South Dunedin’s Mayfair, especially suited to musical offerings and hosting the annual Gilbert and Sullivan productions, has had its financial battles, as has the unique Globe Theatre, started by the Careys in the iconic house built and inhabited by Dunedin’s first mayor. The Playhouse, home of New Zealand’s pioneering Southern Comedy Players, and the University’s Allen Hall, busiest theatre venue in the country, also struggle, yet all valiantly continue to take the risks required to bring local playwrights and challenging theatre to the people.

The city has recently managed to raise two million dollars to save the beautiful Regent theatre. This is a pittance compared with what has been poured into the new Stadium. If Dunedin has any appreciation of the amazing benefits theatre brings to a society, it should surely strive to ensure that all our theatres need not pursue a purely commercial line, but can aspire to follow their own true vision. 
_______________________________
For more production details, click on the title above. Go to Home page to see other Reviews, recent Comments and Forum postings (under Chat Back), and News.

Comments

Barbara Frame August 26th, 2010

Agreed, Terry. The plays we've seen this year, while safe and largely undemanding, have all been good. I don't have a problem with the individual choices, just the fact that collectively they don't constitute the exciting mix I'd like to see.

Terry MacTavish August 26th, 2010

Yes, Barbara, you're right,  - I just felt the 'froth' had already been well whipped this year with Fortune's truly delightful 39 Steps. (Moreover there are non-professional companies doing a pretty good job with the Ding Dongs!) 

But I should perhaps have acknowledged the excellent work of Fortune's dramaturg in researching potential plays. It's a pity about the financial constraints. Like you, Barbara, I not only relish stimulating theatre, but am a loyal longtime supporter of Fortune, and never happier than when I can genuinely enthuse about a production!

Dane Giraud August 24th, 2010

 Ah... no it doesn't. 

John Smythe August 24th, 2010

The model you suggest already exists, Martyn, under Project Funding through CNZ, through the various Festival and Fringe Festivals that ignite communities around the country … There are many opportunities for practitioner-led work to get support.

As for theatre being ‘necessary’ … Children play and make up plays; adults make plays and go to plays … What we call the performing arts are manifestations of natural, healthy, essential human behaviour.  The only societies in which they do not occur are politically repressed. 

As an agent of collective will and responsibility, the state has a role in facilitating our natural need and desire to express ourselves.

Corus August 24th, 2010

 I like this but - which practitioners?  How many? Who chooses?

martyn roberts August 24th, 2010

Paul Weller said "The public wants what the public gets..." and I look at this as a way of trying to understand this thing called market forces.

The socialist model of state funded theatre once worked to a certain degree here in NZ, the heyday being the 70's early 80's. It is the model that enabled Roger Hall to succeed as a fulltime playwright, with a collection of fully staffed company venues up and down the country making it possible. The late 80's saw this model have the life kicked out of it as funding dried up and those full companies became barely surviving venues for hire, the exception perhaps being Elric's tenacity at the Court.

Why then are we still somehow holding on to an old ideal that theatre in this country is 'deserving' of venues through which we can gauge the public psyche? There is no magical 'audience' who demand to see challenging stories. There is no authentic voice that reflects the NZ public. We cannot constantly 'give the audience what they want' because 'they' firstly don't exist, and if 'they' do then they don't KNOW what they want.

I think there is a false illusion that somehow theatre is held up as some great neccessary art in society, when the reality is theatre is the cricket equivalent of Bangladesh. NZ has the population of Melbourne and is spread over a very wide area, each area having it's own needs. Why are we funding so much to get so little in return? We only end up serving what the public gets.

I am trying to say many things here I guess, but the upshot is that I believe we need to fund the practitioners, not the bricks and mortar venues. Take all the funding away from venues and let the 'market forces' decide what the public wants? Maybe then we might just see how unimportant theatre actually is....or we may be pleasantly surprised.

John Smythe August 24th, 2010

New Zealand is my sandpit, Martyn. I think Dunedin is still part of New Zealand. I think CNZ funding policy applies to all of NZ. I think NZ performing arts may be seen as one body and it is therefore in all our interests that all its vital organs are healthy and productive.   

Barbara Frame August 23rd, 2010

 Terry, I'm not quite sure that I agree with your suggestion that this play shouldn't be performed. A play like this definitely has a place as the 'froth' in a varied and stimulating season.

But varied and stimulating isn't what we've been seeing at the Fortune this year. As you say, every play seems to have been chosen because it's safe, safe, safe.

Safe is ok sometimes. But theatre should also demand something of its audience, and be capable of sending us out into the street feeling provoked, confronted, transported, thunderstruck, unsettled or mystified - and that hasn't been happening.

Yes I know, it's all about money, and this is where funding should come in - funding to allow a theatre to take risks, to do the many astonishing things that theatre is capable of. 

The Fortune is our local professional theatre. It's history has been a little mixed,but the best things that have happened there have been very, very good. I understand that changes are afoot, and I hope that that will lead to more challenging programming. In the meantime, let's hope for the best from The Pitmen Painters in October.

martyn roberts August 23rd, 2010

I absolutely agree John. So if we start to throw stones let us also call into question the system that allows Circa to double dip the taxpayer by having 2 entities that gain funding from CNZ. Let us also look at the 'meaningless' pap served up at Court, ATC, Centrepoint and Circa and really ask whether any of the venues 'deserve' state funding. This is the question really isn't it. What happens when a theatre like Fortune is cut back to the bone - the bone marrow actually - that it has no other choice but to tread the very fine line that allows it to keep the doors open. Programming middle of the road fare to bring in the money is not exclusive to Fortune, and to accuse Fortune of not trying hard enough, as you insinuate John, is simply not true. Go play in your own sandpit please.

John Smythe August 23rd, 2010

Personally I see no justification in the NZ taxpayer subsidising a theatre that serves up meaningless pap that achieves little more than giving people work and showing off their talents. There are much better ways for creative skills to be applied.

What interests me, however, is whether the decision to programme Ding Dong was a function of recent Creative New Zealand policy (which seems – correct me if I’m wrong – to have emphasised bums on seats over the source or quality of the work).  If so, what are the implications for Fortune’s fortunes given the New Funding Programmes for Multi-Year Arts Investments (assuming Fortune would like to get multi-year funding)?

Oh, and there’s a thought: given the desire to put on a popular farce for winter, did Fortune attempt to get the rights to mount their own production of Dave Armstrong’s Le Sud (as the Auckland Theatre Company did) or was the existing production inextricably committed to the Otago Festival of the Arts (where it will play at the Settlers Festival Theatre)?

Make a comment

Wellingon City Council
Auckland City Council
PatronBase