Lost: SHADES
Happy (Cnr Tory & Vivian), Wellington
15/02/2009 - 17/02/2009
Production Details
LOST:
Shades, a small Pekinese dog.
Reward: $5. $2.
What have you lost today? Your wallet? Track of time? Your temper?
Utilising areas of Happy usually only frequented by the cleaners and couriers, LOST: Shades will prompt the audience to look for what they think has gone for ever. Whether they find or not is up to them.
Lost:SHADES is a new theatre piece that examines what it is to experience loss – whether it’s something as life changing as being exiled from one’s country or something as banal and everyday as misplacing your keys. We all know the feelings that accompany losing something – anger, despair, grief, frustration, and every now and then, a bit of relief of being divested of something you never really cared for anyway. If we were into cliché, we would call it a "rollercoaster ride of emotions."
Combining puppetry, masks, physical theatre, live music, excerpts from the writings of Sally Rodwell and Alan Brunton, and the lowest of low-fi multimedia, LOST:Shades encapsulates the spirit of the Fringe by producing a theatrical experience quite unlike anything else you might find this year.
The Society of Paper Dogs was founded when two members of the acclaimed Red Mole off-shoot group Roadworks moved to Auckland from Wellington in 2007, and joined with local actors and musicians. They aim to continue and develop the style of work that Roadworks was known for – an expedition through poetry, drama and comedy.
"Eleven spice jars. One missing."
LOST:Shades
9pm, 15 – 17 February
Happy, cnr. Tory and Vivian Streets
Tickets: $15 (full)/$12 (concession)/$10 (Fringe Addict)
Door sales or bookings via societyofpaperdogs@gmail.com
More information, including video and audio content, on http://societyofpaperdogs.wordpress.com
An underwhelming mystery
Review by Thomas LaHood 19th Feb 2009
I will keep this review brief, as I don’t have anything kind to say. This show is not an enjoyable experience. The content is the theatrical equivalent of bad poetry – the text vague and florid, the delivery halting, the performances stilted and unconvincing, the chorus disorganized, the staging frankly abysmal and the whole effort giving off a distinctly under-rehearsed, rudderless feel of poor direction.
Birds of the underworld in mask guide us through this journey – but where are we going, and why? We’re dragged up the stairs, out to the carpark and down again, made to change direction in our seats more or less every scene and then finally taken down the hall to sit on the concrete stairs, and at no time does there seem a reason that the feeble fragments of turgid monologue or cumbersome dance we witness there require this shift of locations. The whole thing is an underwhelming mystery.
The finale involves an enigmatic and bland character reading a profoundly unengaging text from a scroll which she unwinds slowly as she retreats from the audience. Upon her exit a dancer appears who wraps herself in the unfurled paper and spins offstage in the same direction, where she is partially hidden behind a wall, awkwardly sticking out until the final blackout. This for me summed up the quality of the whole show, a bungled piece of staging that, even had it been performed cleanly and skillfully, would still have held little meaning or interest.
The absence of a programme for the show means I can’t single anyone out for blame – probably for the best. Most of the cast seemed pretty young, certainly they were unskilled. I won’t further take them to task – this is the Fringe after all and groups like this can only exist here, at the periphery of society’s interest. But one has to wonder, with a show so seemingly vague in intention, and with enough seats in the venue only to accommodate around 16 people, who are they making it for?
Copyright © in the review belongs to the reviewer
Comments
Thomas LaHood February 26th, 2009
Well, no. I was in a great mood, and as always when directly engaged before the show by actors in costume I was getting very excited about the ride. My sniffy tone probably expresses mostly my feeling that a show in this state shouldn't really be put in front of an audience, let alone critically reviewed as a complete show. It's hurtful, because I know people involved in the production and I'm aware of their pedigree, but really, a spade is a spade.Melody Nixon February 22nd, 2009
Thomas, what a profoundly stingy review. Surely, surely, there was something in this show worth noting, even if it was going to take you a bit of heroic force of will to unravel it. Admit it, you were already in a bad mood that day, weren't you?