The Brothers Size

Herald Theatre, Aotea Centre, The Edge, Auckland

27/05/2011 - 18/06/2011

Production Details



SILO THEATRE GIVES BROTHERHOOD FULL, POETIC VOICE

“…Listen closely, and you might hear that thrilling sound that is one of the main reasons we go to the theatre, that beautiful music of a new voice…” – THE NEW YORK TIMES 

A tour-de-force from the leading young voice of the African American theatre, Tarell Alvin McCraney’s THE BROTHERS SIZE is set to thrill audiences with its sheer kinetic energy – words, bodies and actions rebound at Auckland’s Herald Theatre from May 27. 

Recently paroled Oshoosi Size finds an uneasy home with his older brother Ogun in the atmospheric bayou country of Louisiana. Ogun – straight living and hard working – feels both the charge and resentment of a life long duty to protect his permanently innocent younger brother. With the arrival of the charming and sinister Elegba, an ex-con with his own claims to the brotherhood, a delicate stability is threatened and fraternal ties will be tested. 

Tarell Alvin McCraney’s work relocates Nigerian myth to the grit of urban reality, the projects. His writing touches on a wealth of traditions while re-imagining their relevance to contemporary audiences. Armed with the voice of the street, McCraney folds together slangy vernacular with bursts of glorious heartfelt poetry, making THE BROTHERS SIZE next generation theatre which is spiritually infused, highly theatrical but immediately accessible.

“…McCraney writes with a passion and urgency that can’t be faked, in a style that invests ordinary lives with the grandeur of ancient gods. Watching these plays, you experience the excited wonder that comes from witnessing something rare in the theatre : a new, authentically original vision…” – THE NEW YORK TIMES

McCraney was raised in the projects of Miami, with family members who battled drug addiction and a mother who died from an AIDS-related illness at the age of 40. He’s described the world of theatre as a lifeline out of the poverty that dominated his upbringing: “Theatre, as well as dance and music, allowed me the ability to put the large questions into a form that, at least, ordered them into a more beautiful chaos. That’s all we ever really want in life, right? To feel like we can for a moment order the chaos into something managable, or at least perceptible.”

Described by the Chicago Tribute as “the greatest piece of writing by an American playwright under 30 in a generation or more”, THE BROTHERS SIZE was written when McCraney was just 25. It forms the second part of a trilogy called THE BROTHER/SISTER PLAYS and has been met with critical acclaim and clutches of awards. It has gone on to become on of the most performed plays on international stages, with acclaimed companies such as Steppenwolf, the Young Vic and New York’s Public Theater picking it up for production.

New Zealand’s own theatrical trail blazer Silo Theatre has engaged a trio of some of New Zealand’s finest Maori and Pacific Island talent to bring alive this physical, poignant epic. Pua Magasiva (Sione’s Wedding, Well Hung),Jarod Rawiri (Matariki, The Arrival) and Te Kohe Tuhaka (Tama Tu, Shortland Street) explore the counterpoint between our own cultural heartbeat and contemporary (African) American culture. Auckland composer Tama Waipara has been commissioned to create a soundtrack which will fuse West African drumming, soul, R&B and hip-hop. 

Following his critically acclaimed 2010 productions That Face and When The Rain Stops Falling, Silo Theatre Artistic Director Shane Bosher directs his first production of 2011.

THE BROTHERS SIZE plays
May 27th – June 18th 2011
Herald Theatre, THE EDGE
Tickets: $25.00 – $49.00 (service fees apply)
Tickets available through THE EDGE – www.buytickets.co.nz or 09 357 3355 


Elegba                                     TE KOHE TUHAKA
Oshoosi Size                         PUA MAGASIVA
Ogun Size                               JAROD RAWIRI
Percussion                             JOHN ELLIS
 
direction                                 SHANE BOSHER
set design                              RACHAEL WALKER
costume design                    SARA TAYLOR
lighting design                       VERA THOMAS
sound design and
composition                           TAMA WAIPARA
movement                              MARIANNE SCHULTZ
 
production management     ANDREW MALMO
stage management              STACEY DONALDSON
technical operation               SEAN LYNCH
set construction                     2 CONSTRUCT
scenic painting                      RENEE TE PAIRI
properties management     PIP SMITH
 
marketing                              ANGELA GOURDIE
                                                NIGEL GRANT
graphic design                     CONCRETE
production photography     PATRICK REYNOLDS
                                                ANDREW MALMO

publicity                                 ELEPHANT PUBLICITY 



Art and life as one

Review by Lexie Matheson ONZM 29th May 2011

If you engage with no other theatre experience this year, you must see The Brothers Size. Everything about the production is superb. I could leave it at that but what would be the point? And there are a couple. 

The Herald Theatre has to be the most intricate performance space in the country. Designed for mountain goats and stair-climbers, the steep rake is a challenge for designers, directors, actors and audience alike, but proves, in this rare instance, no challenge to anyone. More about this later.

I attended on opening night which, from the behaviours I witnessed, was enjoyed by almost everyone. The social occasion, I mean, not the production, as the two seemed to elicit quite different responses from the same group of people. Call me an old wowser if you like but I have never cared much for opening nights, not as an actor or director, certainly not as a writer (or critic) and as an audience I invariably find them hateful (do I hear an echo of ‘old wowser’ and if I do I have to say I simply don’t care!)

I’ve been to opening nights in countless countries but in Aotearoa/New Zealand we seem to be unique in our response. And I do reiterate that this is my view and I accept that I am probably wildly outnumbered. I skipped through the drinkers and jibber-jabberers in the foyer, hesitantly descended the stairs into the guts of the Herald and happily devoured the attractive programme.

It didn’t take long as it’s a slight volume but the emphasis on playwright Tarell Alvin McCraney was invigorating and the lack of narcissistic stuff about the actors and production team was refreshing. Who needs it when Shane Bosher is the director, Rachel Walker, Tama Waipara and Vera Thomas are in charge of the design, Marianne Schultz is looking after the movement and Andrew Malmo has managed the whole kit and caboodle. It has class and maturity written all over it. 

If you don’t know of these good folk then just sit back and be amazed because The Brothers Size doesn’t just have great parts, it sees these parts integrated in an organic and buoyant manner that makes the sum of the parts seem sublimely more.

In fact much, much more. You’ll note I haven’t mentioned the actors yet. That’s because they’re OK too. 

No surprise either to find that Jacque Drew was the dialect coach and clearly an integral part of this fine line-up providing a vital yet unobtrusive bond between actor and audience. The relationship between dialect coach and actors has clearly been impressive because the actors not only own the complex dialect of the Louisiana Projects and the bayou but they make it readily accessible to the audience as well.

But back to that first impression …

As I gobbled up the programme I became increasingly conscious of the escalating racket in the auditorium, that over-loud, opening night, ‘look at me’ prattle that somewhat belittles the occasion and I remembered that it seemed an eon since I last attended a ‘real’ opening night and all the reasons why this was the case. The only art so far on show seemed to be artifice, artfulness and artificiality.

When the gentleman (and I use the term pejoratively) in the seat to my right began an epileptic tête-à-tête with his elbows and I began to be oofed and jostled as he spun his head like Linda Blair in the exorcist, hell-bent on seeing who was behind us on the hill that is the Herald, I began to ache, literally, for the lights to dim and the evening proper to begin but I was to, forlornly, wait until 8.20pm for the fun to really start. 

While the pre-show encounter was, for me, less than perfect it’s also fair to say that, once the play began the audience was exemplary in its behaviour right down to the spontaneous – and thoroughly earned – standing ovation at the conclusion of the evening. So it’s true: the play’s the thing.

The Brothers Size is an extraordinary achievement on so many levels. That it exists at all is a monument to the human spirit.

McCraney grew up in the Louisiana Projects which is a country mile from the Yale School of Drama Playwriting programme, from which he graduated with the Cole Porter Award in 2007, and the Royal Shakespeare Company’s RSC/Warwick International Playwright in Residence post that he held in 2008. 

In a word: this kid is the goods.

The Brothers Size is the centrepiece of McCraney’s triptych of life in the projects built around the context of Yaruba mythology and ritual, and spat and slurped through the mystical and syrupy rhythms of the modern – and traditional – south. The trilogy of plays begins with In the Red and Brown Water which explores regeneration, procreation and the image of the child as a reflection of the mother who is, ironically, named Oya after the Yoruban goddess of fertility and nature.

Then comes The Brothers Size. 

The third part of the trilogy is Marcus; or the Secret of Sweet which sees a young man exploring the why of his sexual identity through a connection with his deceased father. 

The three plays share characters, setting and form and I’ll be surprised if we don’t see more of McCraney’s work staged in Auckland, though Wig Out! is a more likely first option with its exciting and provocative exploration of the competitive and vicious world of the drag ball.  It’s Queen of the Whole Universe with teeth (and tits). And with a team like this, who wouldn’t want to do more!

The tryptich is connected by the tag Exhale. Inhale. Tell the tale which encapsulates this set of works in a nutshell.

Rachel Walker’s set is divine in its simplicity: a raised, square platform, oil and water stained in a cool light blue. Lit by Vera Thomas’s subtle wash it is all things to all men in this archetypical man’s world or, more specifically, San Pere in Louisiana, near the bayou sometime in the distant present. The only break from the symmetry is John Ellis’s exquisitely executed percussion lurking ominously in the back corner.

Tama Waipara’s choice of recorded music is clever: minimalist but evocative, sweat-filled yet modestly understated. And herein is the essence of this production’s success.

It’s as though all the components recognise each other, fit together, mesh like finely tuned cogs and compel the character-driven narrative inexorably forward towards the moment – that timeless moment – when Ogun Size is alone in the world, alone in a world he never made, couldn’t have predicted, yet has gripped with such radiance in the moment preceding.

This is a play about moments and each has its own breath, its own thrash, its own pulse.

Only in the hands of the finest of directors can work of this quality be produced and, to his extraordinary credit, Shane Bosher’s exemplary hand is invisible in the result. It’s often said that when a production is crap the director gets the blame, when it’s good the actor’s get the credit. With no discredit to the actors, Bosher deserves the biggest of big-ups for this fine work.

I said earlier that the actors are OK. I lied. The actors are ferociously good. They are flawless in every way. From the authenticity of the dialect which never overpowers the narrative – how often do we see actors perform the accent and forget about the play – to their commitment to the Manly Art of Car Repair which permeates the text, these are performances of real stature, performances to treasure, performances of world class. 

Ogun Size (Jarod Rawiri) is the taut and staunch older brother. Largely humourless, but never without humour, Ogun exemplifies the spirit of the pseudo-spiritual The Road is Rough of the opening episode. Wrenched kicking and screaming from Luke 10: 25-42, this work song, powerfully re-enacted, sets the tone for the entire production. 

Oshoosi Size (the wonderful Pua Magasiva) is the embodiment of the younger brother. Recently out of jail and still on probation he is work-shy and hip. He is also the bane of his older brother’s life and the love between the two is at the heart of the play with Ogun trying his damnedest to keep Oshoosi out of strife while Oshoosi is drawn relentlessly back into it. 

Enter Elegba (the gorgeous Te Kohe Tuhaka) who is the quintessence of cool and Oshoosi’s bête noir. He’s a buddy from the pen and frankly irresistible. This relationship – and Ogun’s onlooker status – is always going to end in tears, and so it does.  Manly, oil-stained tears, of course.

To say more is to expose the play’s narrative secrets – and there are a few – but the brilliance of the production exists in its wholeness as a work of pure art, in the performances, their relationships each with each and with us.

These are actors of whom we, as a nation, can truly be proud. They have exceptional craft and flexibility, they have monumental dollops of talent and they know how to truly respect the work. What’s more, they present as the epitome of beautiful young gods who have respect for their own physicality, and the uses to which they put the tools of their trade are simply remarkable. They have uniform vocal and physical power and each has access to an emotional range that is mid-boggling.

Best of all they have what Raymond Hawthorne once said was the soul of great acting: the ability to recreate a sense of spontaneity, of life happening for the first time, when in fact it has been carefully and thoughtfully rehearsed.

Mervyn ‘Proc’ Thompson often said that the success of a theatre work could best be measured by the resonances left after the experience. I have lived with Ogun Size’s last few moments vividly in my mind for the last 48 hours and have been more than happy to do so. This would not have been possible without the work of the entire ensemble that built to this moment and I applaud each and every one of you for allowing me the privilege of sharing this work with you. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. 

As I left the theatre, filled with the play, the emotions, the characters and all those wonderful resonances, I was confronted, on Queen Street by a street preacher who insisted that I could be saved if only I allowed Jesus into my life. I stood, transfixed, for a few moments as this quasi-southern Baptist evangelical mimic berated me before I realised, like a bolt from heaven, that I had left the truth of the theatre only to find bad acting and fraudulence out on the street.

So much for life imitating art. I had just experienced art and life as one. That’s good enough for me.
_______________________________
For more production details, click on the title above. Go to Home page to see other Reviews, recent Comments and Forum postings (under Chat Back), and News.  

Comments

Lexie Matheson June 16th, 2011

Never surrender ... but you can have the last word ... um ... bugger ... :-)

Patron June 2nd, 2011

To Lexie,

I surrender.

Patron.

Lexie Matheson June 2nd, 2011

All good.

I can't comment on your experience as I didn't see The Brothers Size on the night you did. I'm not sure what night Janet saw it. I read her review and enjoyed it.

I hold to my view that this playwright is exceptional and that the pacing was just right. I like any work to breathe in a unique way (especially important with a work tagged as 'inhale, exhale, tell the tale'). To me the text is really interesting because the narrative is interrupted often by sections that don't necessarily develop the 'plot' in a traditional manner but concentrate on the evolution of the characters. If an audience member is interested primarily in the story then these sections may seem superfluous and slow but to me it seemed like courageous (and culturally approriate) structuring and I said so. I'm not inclined to understate my opinion when writing a review because reviewing is an opinionated process. If you think my reviews are OTT I suggest you read some of the late Bruce Mason's or, for vitriol, Paul Bushnell's. Readers can make up their own minds as you have. Plaudits for that.

When we go to the theatre we're all contructivists so each of us will have a different experience to the person sitting alongside them. Long live that!! If we all had the same experience how boring would that be.

I said the performances were flawless and I hold to that view. I assess performance on vocal quality, skill and choice, on the credibility, approriateness and preparation of physicality, on emotional richness and choice (including the use of the 'play against'), on technique, on intellectual readiness and application, on organic interaction, on choices made in general (which includes making the choice to avoid the obvious choice) and the authenticity (magic) of the whole thing. I try not to allow my assessment of performances to be inhibited by any shortcomings in the vehicle the cast are driving ~ it is possible to have fine performances of poor scripts and this should also be acknowledged when it happens. The opposite can also be true.

I found these actors, all of whom I had seen in other work this year, to be physically, emotionally, interactively, vocally and intellectually on top of their game. Without visible flaw, in fact, on the night I saw them. So I said so.

I write my reviews as a record of the experience I have had which is all I can comment on. I will invariably comment on audience reaction and numbers as well as whether the production is recreational (amateur) or is part of a professional profile. This enables me to, hopefully, acknowledge success using a variable scale. What is great amateur theatre may sometimes be considered sub-standard if produced by 'professionals' though I know this is debatable as I'm still not really sure what a 'professional' is even after so many years. Is it a term based on quality or income or just a status batten to beat people around the heads with?

I endeavour to inform, to background, maybe to provoke even, but whatever I write it's always my subjective opinion seen through my constructivist eyes. It's seems important to acknowledge this. The fact that I've been around forever as a practitioner and commentator makes my opinion no more valid than that of someone seeing their first piece of theatre. It's just different, is all. If people ~ potential 'patrons' ~ choose to make decisions based on what I've said then that's their choice and if we disagree how wonderful (am I allowed to say 'wonderful, it does sound a bit OTT in the context of this conversation) that we have the chance to share our views here. Hopefully everyone benefits. It's certainly more productive than settling our differences in the carpark in front of The Basement ... though I do believe that, on occasion, this has been done :-)

Lexie

Patron June 2nd, 2011

Hi Lexie,

Re: “letting a reviewer's opinion determine whether or not you engage with a piece of theatre.” I’m not sure what the point of a review is if not to assist in making up one’s mind whether or not to see a particular play, film etc?

Anyway, after I had a little spew I felt a lot better and went along to see The Brothers Size last night. It was good. Okay...It was very good (gosh, that was hard). It was also however, far from the sublime perfection you would have readers of your review believe. From my experience last night, it started with a bang, sagged in the middle and dare I say it ended with a whimper. Okay, whimper is a little harsh but the boys were definitely milking it a bit at the end.  As Janet McAllister notes in her review, the pacing definitely needs picking up at points and this would go a long way to improving the whole experience. And I guess that’s sorta what I’m driving at here with my friendly piss-take of your review Lexie. To be useful, reviews need to be balanced i.e. point out the good and the not so good. To my ears (and maybe others) when a review is as glowing and gushing as yours, it comes across more as an infomercial than anything else! :-)

Barnaby Fredric June 1st, 2011

(post deleted by commenter)


Lexie Matheson May 31st, 2011

Hi Patron,

Thanks for your comment. Much appreciated, though it's a bit like saying you hate a book when you've only read the dust jacket. I'm a bit sad for you if you let a reviewer's opinion determine whether or not you engage with a piece of theatre. If I'd let a reviewers opinion affect me that much I would have found it difficult, more often than not, to turn up to plays I was in or had directed! What you read is what I experienced with a bit of background thrown in. Nothing more. Audience response, I suggest, supports my view and I'm not going to follow on in some Kiwi-Calvinist fashion and praise with faint damns or damn with faint praise. If there was a standing ovation (as there was) and I'd hated the show, I'd have said that too. Man up, Patron, make your own decisions and if you don't like my reviews don't read them. Or better still, write your own. But hey, see the play first: :-)

Best,

Lexie

Patron May 30th, 2011

Firstly, big ups to me for making it to the end of that review! Phew! Quite an effort. Secondly, I was looking forward to seeing The Brothers Size but this sycophantic gush of a review has left me feeling somewhat nauseous and gee, I don't know...I mean my dad always said "if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is!". Seriously..."flawless acting"...not good, not great, but flawless...hmmmmm

patrick graham May 30th, 2011

Thanks Lexie for your well written review.

What has always dismayed me about critics on this site, thinking actors develop their performances in isolation with no guidance from the director, has been addressed.

Many times when John Smythe has reviewed my shows he has criticised me as a director and then gone on to praise an actor for the choices they made as an actor... this has always been rather insulting knowing it was my choice as a director not that of the actors... I asked the actor to perform in a certain way so that their performance fitted with my overall vision for the play... something that doesn't happen in isolation.

It is finally nice to see a director given credit for seizing a production by the balls and doing what a director is supposed to do and direct actor’s choices into a coherent whole... so that the performances suit the style/genre/form of the production.

Congratulations to Shane and the cast and thank you Lexie for raising the bar for reviews on this site.

 

Make a comment

Wellingon City Council
Auckland City Council
PatronBase